← Back to all Signals

Guidance: Regulated aerodrome location codes for Data Element 5/23 of the Customs Declaration Service

Source
HM Revenue & Customs - Activity
Source link
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/certificate-of-agreement-airports-location-codes-for-data-element-523-of-the-customs-declaration-service
Published
2026-08-17 10:45:22
Discovered by ProcIntel
2026-08-17 14:35:59
Category
Regulation, Tariffs, Sanctions & Trade
Geography
UK
Organisations
Review status
Pending
Record type
REAL

Summary

Find a list of the codes which may be used to identify the location where goods may be examined for regulated aerodromes (Appendix 16B).

Procurement Relevance Gate

PASS — score 22.8/100 — evaluated 2026-08-17 14:35:59
Passed on: regulation_sanctions_trade_controls, geographic_exposure (score 22.8/100, threshold 20.0).
  • regulation_sanctions_trade_controls (weight 12) — matched on "customs"
  • geographic_exposure (weight 8) — matched on "1 linked geography"

Initial Signal Assessment ProcIntel's automatic, provisional read of this individual Signal -- Initial Significance and Initial Confidence, computed deterministically before any Event extraction or human review.

A provisional, automatically-computed reading of this individual Signal, before Event extraction or human review. Not a final rating.

Initial Significance
2 · Moderate (26.0/100)
Initial Confidence
2 · Low (32.5/100)
Data sufficiency Whether enough structured evidence exists to trust this Signal's Initial Confidence reading. 'Sufficient' has no cap; 'Partial' and 'Insufficient' cap Confidence until more evidence is available; 'Not Assessed' means the Signal did not pass the Relevance Gate.
Insufficient
Strongest contributor
Procurement Impact
Limiting factor
Geographic Breadth

Initial Significance Moderate (26.0/100). Strongest contributor: Procurement Impact (21.0/30 points). Limiting factor: Geographic Breadth (0.0/10 points). Initial Confidence Low (32.5/100, data sufficiency: Insufficient). Strongest contributor: Source Authority (40.0/40 points). Limiting factor: Specificity (0.0/20 points).

  • No likely Event type matched; a low contextual baseline was applied.
  • No eligible (non-geographic, non-fictional) entities were linked to this Signal.
  • no confidence-specificity evidence (actor entity, date, quantified value, or concrete verb)
  • no matched Event type
  • no actor entities (only attribution/metadata, if any)
  • no actor content-derived geography
  • single source only
  • structurally non-narrative content
  • Only source-level entity metadata was available.
  • Only source-level geography metadata was available.
  • Source metadata did not contribute to Initial Confidence.
  • 1 distinct hedging pattern(s) matched (capped at 20).
  • No content-derived entity or Event evidence was identified.

Methodology signal_scoring_v1 — calculated 2026-08-17 14:35:59.