Signal · Regulation & Trade
Hellenic DPA decision on a data breach involving E.E.T.A.A. S.A. as processor for the Ministry of Social Cohesion and Family Affairs
What the source reported
Source-reported<div class="heading-wrapper"><h2 id="background-information">Background information</h2><ul><li>Date of final decision: 28/07/2026</li><li>National case</li><li>Controller: Ministry of Social Cohesion and Family Affairs</li><li>Legal Reference(s): Article 25 (Data protection by design and by default), Article 28 (Processor), Article 32 (Security of processing), Article 33 (Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority) and Article 34 (Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject)</li><li>Decision: Administrative fine, Compliance order, </li></ul></div><div class="heading-wrapper"><h2 id="summary-of-the-decision">Summary of the Decision</h2><h3>Origin of the case </h3><p>The Hellenic Data Protection Authority (DPA) investigated a large-scale personal data breach affecting the information systems of the Hellenic Agency for Local Development and Local Government (E.E.T.A.A.) S.A., which were used to implement programmes of the Ministry of Social Cohesion and Family Affairs.</p><h3>Key Findings</h3><p>The breach affected databases containing personal data of a large number of data subjects, including identification and contact details, financial and health data. The Hellenic DPA found that the Ministry of Social Cohesion and Family Affairs, in its capacity as controller, had complied with its obligations concerning the notification of the breach to the Authority and its communication to the affected data subjects. However, the Authority found that the success of the attack was associated with E.E.T.A.A.’s continued use of outdated information systems and inadequate security measures, despite its awareness of the relevant risks. The DPA found infringements of the requirements relating to the security of processing, as well as deficiencies in compliance with the requirements of Article 28 GDPR governing the relationship between the controller and the processor.</p><h3>Decision</h3><p>The Hellenic DPA imposed administrative fines of EUR 200 000 on the Ministry of Social Cohesion and Family Affairs and EUR 150 000 on E.E.T.A.A. It also ordered the parties (i.e. the Ministry and E.E.T.A.A.) to enter into a data processing agreement pursuant to Article 28 GDPR and to fully implement the planned measures to strengthen the security of their information systems.</p><p><strong>For further information:</strong> </p><ul><li><a href="https://www.dpa.gr/el/enimerwtiko/prakseisArxis/apofasi-gia-peristatiko-parabiasis-prosopikon-dedomenon-eetaa-me-tin">Decision on an incident of personal data breach of EETAA in his capacity as a processor on behalf of the data controller of YKOISO (EL)</a></li></ul></div>
- Publication
- EDPB News RSS · Government/Regulator
- Published
- 8th October 2026
- Original report
- edpb.europa.eu
ProcIntel stores what the source published in its feed — a headline, a summary and a link. It does not store or reproduce the full article.
What ProcIntel recorded
ProcIntel-derived- Category
- Regulation & Trade
- Geography
- European Union
- Organisations
- None identified
- Collected
- 8th October 2026 · 18:20
Initial assessment ProcIntel's automatic, provisional read of this individual Signal -- Initial Significance and Initial Confidence, computed deterministically before any Event extraction or human review.
A provisional, automatically computed reading of this individual Signal, before Event extraction or human review. Not a final rating.
Initial Significance Material (56.0/100). Strongest contributor: Procurement Impact (30.0/30 points). Limiting factor: Geographic Breadth (0.0/10 points). Initial Confidence Moderate (62.75/100, data sufficiency: Partial). Strongest contributor: Source Authority (40.0/40 points). Limiting factor: Corroboration (2.5/25 points).
- Strongest contributor
- Procurement Impact
- Limiting factor
- Geographic Breadth